Evidence · Five peace agreements

Peace is possible. Here is the proof.

Wars that seemed endless have been ended at a table, by people who decided to talk. None of these agreements is perfect, and we say where they fell short. All of them saved lives.

  1. Egypt and Israel · 1978–1979

    Thirteen days in the woods of Maryland.

    30

    years in a state of war, since 1948

    13

    days of talks at Camp David

    1st

    Arab state to recognise Israel

    In September 1978, Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin spent thirteen days at Camp David, the US presidential retreat, negotiating face to face. More than once one of them was ready to leave; each time Jimmy Carter talked them back to the table. They signed the Camp David Accords on 17 September 1978, and a peace treaty in Washington on 26 March 1979.

    Israel withdrew its troops and settlers from the Sinai, which it had held since 1967, completing the withdrawal in April 1982. Egypt recognised Israel. Sadat and Begin shared the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize.

    What made it work · our reading

    A mediator who refuses to let the talks collapse, and a trade both sides can live with: land for recognition.

    What didn’t go to plan

    It is often called a “cold peace”, with little warmth between the two societies. Egypt was suspended from the Arab League for ten years, and Sadat was assassinated in 1981. The treaty’s provisions on Palestinian autonomy were never put into practice. But the treaty itself has remained in force for more than four decades.

    Sources: Camp David Accords Egypt–Israel peace treaty Nobel Peace Prize 1978

  2. Mozambique · 1992

    A peace brokered by a community with no army.

    15

    years of civil war, from 1977

    ~1m

    people killed by fighting and famine

    76,000+

    soldiers demobilised

    Mozambique’s civil war between the FRELIMO government and the RENAMO rebels cost around a million lives, most of them through hunger as fighting cut off food. Talks began in July 1990, mediated not by a superpower but by the Community of Sant’Egidio, a lay Catholic association, together with a Mozambican archbishop and an Italian government envoy.

    The General Peace Accords were signed in Rome on 4 October 1992. A UN mission, ONUMOZ, oversaw the demobilisation of more than 76,000 soldiers from both sides and the collection of about 155,000 weapons. Mozambique held its first multiparty elections in October 1994.

    What made it work · our reading

    Trust can matter more than power: a small, patient mediator both sides believed in did what armies could not.

    What didn’t go to plan

    The peace held for about twenty years, then broke. In 2013 RENAMO declared the 1992 accord void and fighting returned. A new agreement was signed in August 2019, and a breakaway group kept fighting until 2021. Peace had to be made twice.

    Sources: Rome General Peace Accords UN peacekeeping: ONUMOZ RENAMO insurgency, 2013–2021

  3. Northern Ireland · 1998

    The people voted for it, on both sides of the border.

    3,532

    people killed in the Troubles

    71%

    voted yes in Northern Ireland

    94%

    voted yes in the Republic of Ireland

    Three decades of violence known as the Troubles killed 3,532 people, more than half of them civilians. Talks chaired by the US envoy George Mitchell brought together the British and Irish governments and eight Northern Irish parties. The Agreement was signed on Good Friday, 10 April 1998.

    On 22 May 1998 it was put to the people in both parts of Ireland. It was approved by 71.1% of voters in Northern Ireland and 94.4% in the Republic. John Hume and David Trimble received the Nobel Peace Prize that year, and the IRA completed the decommissioning of its weapons in 2005.

    What made it work · our reading

    A settlement endorsed directly by the people is far harder to tear up, especially one that lets everyone be British, Irish, or both.

    What didn’t go to plan

    It ended most of the violence, not all of it. Disarmament took years longer than planned, and the power-sharing government has been suspended several times, once for years at a stretch. Brexit has put new strain on the arrangements. Still, the killing that defined a generation has not returned.

    Sources: Good Friday Agreement CAIN: deaths in the conflict Nobel Peace Prize 1998

  4. Aceh, Indonesia · 2005

    After the wave, a handshake.

    29

    years of conflict, from 1976

    ~15,000

    people killed

    840

    weapons handed over

    The Free Aceh Movement (GAM) fought the Indonesian state for almost thirty years. Two earlier ceasefires collapsed. Then, on 26 December 2004, the Indian Ocean tsunami devastated Aceh. GAM declared a ceasefire, the province opened to international aid, and both sides looked at the conflict differently.

    Five rounds of talks, facilitated by former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari and his Crisis Management Initiative, produced a Memorandum of Understanding signed in Helsinki on 15 August 2005. An unarmed monitoring mission from the EU and Southeast Asian countries watched GAM hand over all 840 of its declared weapons by the end of the year. Ahtisaari received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2008.

    What made it work · our reading

    An experienced, neutral facilitator and unarmed monitors on the ground can turn a fragile moment into a lasting settlement.

    What didn’t go to plan

    The tsunami was one reason among several, alongside military stalemate and a new president who wanted a deal. GAM accepted self-government within Indonesia rather than independence, and some parts of the agreement, such as trying soldiers’ crimes in civilian courts in Aceh, have not been implemented.

    Sources: Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding Aceh Monitoring Mission Nobel Peace Prize 2008

  5. Colombia · 2016

    Rejected by voters, then rewritten within weeks.

    50+

    years of armed conflict

    220,000

    deaths recorded between 1958 and 2013

    13,000+

    former FARC fighters in reintegration

    Colombia’s conflict with the FARC guerrillas lasted more than half a century. After four years of talks, mostly in Havana, the government and the FARC signed a peace agreement in September 2016. On 2 October voters narrowly rejected it, by 50.2% to 49.8%.

    Instead of giving up, both sides went back to the table, listened to the “No” campaign and signed a revised agreement on 24 November 2016, which Congress ratified days later. In 2017 the FARC handed over more than 8,000 weapons to a UN mission. President Juan Manuel Santos received the Nobel Peace Prize; the Nobel Committee noted that the voters had rejected a specific agreement, not the desire for peace.

    What made it work · our reading

    A lost vote does not have to end a peace process. Listening to the people who said no made the agreement stronger.

    What didn’t go to plan

    Implementation has been slow and dangerous. The UN reports 493 former FARC combatants killed since the agreement was signed. Dissident groups refused to disarm or later took up arms again, and other armed groups are still fighting. The peace with the FARC is real, but Colombia is not yet at peace.

    Sources: Colombian peace process Nobel Peace Prize 2016 UN Verification Mission in Colombia

What they have in common

Someone chose to talk first.

In every case, leaders decided that negotiation was worth the political risk, and mediators kept them at the table. That choice is what we ask of the people who represent us.